A && B || C is not if-then-else. C may run
when A is true.[[ $dryrun ]] && echo "Would delete file" || rm fileif [[ $dryrun ]]
then
echo "Would delete file"
else
rm file
fiIt's common to use A && B to run B
when A is true, and A || C to run
C when A is false.
However, combining them into A && B || C is not
the same as if A then B else C.
In this case, if A is true but B is false,
C will run.
For the code sample above, if the script was run with stdout closed
for any reason (such as explicitly running
script --dryrun >&-), echo would fail and the file
would be deleted, even though $dryrun was set!
If an if clause is used instead, this problem is
avoided.
We can think of the example above as
((([[ $dryrun ]]) && echo "Would delete file") || rm file)expressing the left-associativity of the &&
|| operators.
Whenever a command (strictly, a pipeline) succeeds or fails, the
execution proceeds following the next && (for
success) or || (for failure). (More strictly, the
parentheses should be replaced with { command; } to avoid
making a subshell, but that's ugly and boring.)
Ignore this warning when you actually do intend to run C when either A or B fails.
ShellCheck is a static analysis tool for shell scripts. This page is part of its documentation.