if mycmd;, not indirectly with
$?.make mytarget
if [ $? -ne 0 ]
then
echo "Build failed"
fiif ! make mytarget
then
echo "Build failed"
fiFor the Solaris 10 Bourne shell:
if make mytarget
then
:
else
echo "Build failed"
fiRunning a command and then checking its exit status $?
against 0 is redundant.
Instead of just checking the exit code of a command, it checks the
exit code of a command (e.g. [) that checks the exit code
of a command.
Apart from the redundancy, there are other reasons to avoid this pattern:
echo "make finished" after
make will cause the if statement to silently
start comparing echo's status instead.set -e aka
errexit will exit immediately if the command fails, even
though they're followed by a clause that handles failure.$? is overwritten by
[/[[, so you can't get the original value in
the relevant then/else block (e.g.
if mycmd; then echo "Success"; else echo "Failed with $?"; fi).To check that a command returns success, use
if mycommand; then ....
To check that a command returns failure, use
if ! mycommand; then .... Notice that ! will
overwrite $? value.
To additionally capture output with command substitution:
if ! output=$(mycommand); then ...
This also applies to while/until loops.
The default Solaris 10 Bourne shell does not support negating exit
statuses with !, so ! mycommand tries to
invoke a utility named "!" instead. To test for failure, use
if mycommand; then :; else ...; fi and
until mycommand; do ...; done.
None.
ShellCheck is a static analysis tool for shell scripts. This page is part of its documentation.